Mockery of Our Nation, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
To think that he was actually voted in for president still makes my stomach turn!!
When has it been okay to make a mockery of our nation?? When has it ever been okay to have tantrums as the president of the United States and declare a national Emergency just because one doesn’t get his way!!!
Donald Trump is making us as Americans look like fools and we are playing into his game.
Think about it the more frivolous things he does the more we as the people are gonna stand against him. What does that show other countries about us?? From being indebted to many countries and the ass of a president making us look dumb other nations are gonna see us fighting within our own country which then is gonna target us for a lot moire than we know.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to look at the facts at hand and predict what other countries are bound to do, does it??
To have allowed this imbecile to get away with the things that hew has is CRAZY STUPID!!! If we as Americans don’t do something about this asap we are all looking at complete disaster!!! I know there is something that we as a nation can do. Its time we figured it out
here is a little something I researched on how to get the president removed from office:
What, then, is the meaning of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” for which a President may be removed? Neither the Constitution nor the statutes have determined. It follows, therefore, that the House must judge for what offenses it will present articles, and the Senate decide for what it will convict. And from the very nature of the wrongs for which impeachment is the sole adequate remedy, as well as from the fact that the office of President and all its duties and relations are new, it is essential that they should be undefined; otherwise there could be no security for the state.
But it does not by any means follow that therefore either the House or the Senate can act arbitrarily, or that there are not rules for the guidance of their conduct. The terms “high crimes and misdemeanors,” like many other terms and phrases used in the Constitution, as, for instance, “pardon,” “habeas corpus,” “ex post facto,” and the term “impeachment” itself, had a settled meaning at the time of the establishment of the Constitution. There was no need of definition, for it was left to the House as exhibitors, and the Chief Justice and the Senate as judges of the articles, to apply well-understood terms, mutatis mutandis, to new circumstances, as the exigencies of state, and the ends for which the Constitution was established, should require. The subject-matter was new; the President was a new officer of state; his duties, his relations to the various branches of government and to the people, his powers, his oath, functions, duties, responsibilities, were all new. In some respects, old customs and laws were a guide. In others, there was neither precedent nor analogy. But the common-law principle was to be applied to the new matters according to their exigency, as the common law of contracts and of carriers is applied to carriage by steamboats and railroads, to corporations and expresses, which have come into existence centuries since the law was established.